You Don’t Have to Be a Czar, Baby, to Be in My Show

Hop_CzarRaging against “czars” seems all but obligatory these days for movement conservatives. The proliferation of Obama administration czars means “a giant expansion of presidential power,” warns Karl Rove, former domestic policy czar for the Bush administration–which I suppose proves once again that the capacity for embarassment is a career liability in this town.

Conservatives ought to be concerned about the growth of executive power. But as I argue in my Washington Examiner column this week, “czars” are pretty far down any serious list of executive-power concerns:

conservatives’ current bout of czar mania elevates symbolism over substance. All the focus on a scary moniker for certain executive officials misses the real problem: Unconstitutional delegation of power to the executive branch. Whether those illegitimate powers are exercised by unconfirmed presidential advisers or the president himself is quite beside the point….

Often, czars are mere figureheads, appointed to signal concern over the latest hot-button issue. As one presidential scholar puts it, “when in doubt, create a czar.”

True, it’s problematic that some of these appointees aren’t vetted by the Senate, and that presidents claim czars don’t have to answer to Congress — as when the Bush administration asserted in 2002 that executive privilege shielded then-homeland security czar Tom Ridge from testifying on the Hill.

But as the Washington Independent’s Dave Weigel has pointed out, many of the “czars” who appear on the conservative target list already have to be confirmed by the Senate. Others don’t, but when Obama is hell-bent on taking over the health care sector — one-sixth of the U.S. economy — it’s bizarre to agonize over the allegedly unchecked power exercised by the likes of the AIDS and urban affairs czars.

Similarly, while it’s great to see a nutter like Van Jones denied a federal salary, few of those cheering Jones’ defenestration can coherently explain what the green jobs czar actually does, or the threat he was supposed to represent.

What, was Jones going to give 9/11 “Truthers” and black nationalists jobs weatherizing homes? Will we stop wasting money on such projects now that he’s gone?

More here.

(C/P Cato@Liberty)

Posted on Sep 22, 2009 in Domestic Policy, Executive Power | Comments

7 Responses to “You Don’t Have to Be a Czar, Baby, to Be in My Show”

  1. Posted by: Pink Leopard Sunglasses - 09/29/2009

    Isn’t that something!

  2. Posted by: Warix - 10/06/2009

    ???????, ???????

  3. Posted by: Shop - 10/07/2009

    ?? ??? ?????? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???????, ????!

  4. Posted by: ?????????????? - 10/07/2009

    ???????, ? ? ??? ???? RSS ????? ? ???? ??????

  5. Posted by: FontSky - 10/07/2009

    ???????, ? ? ??? ???? RSS ????? ? ???? ??????

  6. Posted by: IsraelFinancialExpert - 01/12/2010

    Go Ron Paul!!

  7. Posted by: Photoshop Tutorial - 03/13/2017

    Find more there:

    […]Nice blog here! Also your website a lot up fast![…]

Comments are closed for this entry.